© 2024 Texas Public Radio
Real. Reliable. Texas Public Radio.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Texans approve property tax cuts, new infrastructure funds and teacher pension boost; reject judge retirement age increase

Gabriel C. Pérez / KUT

Texas voters approved all but one of 14 amendments to the state constitution on the ballot in the Tuesday November 6 election.

While Texans rejected Proposition 13 — which would have increased the retirement age for state judges — voters approved property tax relief, a cost of living adjustment for retired teacher pensions, and investments in infrastructure and parks.

See a breakdown of the propositions results:


Proposition 1 ☑️

“The constitutional amendment protecting the right to engage in farming, ranching, timber production, horticulture, and wildlife management.”

Proposition 2 ☑️

“The constitutional amendment authorizing a local option exemption from ad valorem taxation by a county or municipality of all or part of the appraised value of real property used to operate a child-care facility.”

Proposition 3 ☑️

“The constitutional amendment prohibiting the imposition of an individual wealth or net worth tax, including a tax on the difference between the assets and liabilities of an individual or family.”

Proposition 4 ☑️

“The constitutional amendment to authorize the legislature to establish a temporary limit on the maximum appraised value of real property other than a residence homestead for ad valorem tax purposes; to increase the amount of the exemption from ad valorem taxation by a school district applicable to residence homesteads from $40,000 to $100,000; to adjust the amount of the limitation on school district ad valorem taxes imposed on the residence homesteads of the elderly or disabled to reflect increases in certain exemption amounts; to except certain appropriations to pay for ad valorem tax relief from the constitutional limitation on the rate of growth of appropriations; and to authorize the legislature to provide for a four-year term of office for a member of the board of directors of certain appraisal districts.”

Proposition 5 ☑️

“The constitutional amendment relating to the Texas University Fund, which provides funding to certain institutions of higher education to achieve national prominence as major research universities and drive the state economy.”

Proposition 6 ☑️

“The constitutional amendment creating the Texas water fund to assist in financing water projects in this state.”

Proposition 7 ☑️

“The constitutional amendment providing for the creation of the Texas energy fund to support the construction, maintenance, modernization, and operation of electric generating facilities.”

Proposition 8 ☑️

“The constitutional amendment creating the broadband infrastructure fund to expand high-speed broadband access and assist in the financing of connectivity projects.”

Proposition 9 ☑️

“The constitutional amendment authorizing the 88th Legislature to provide a cost-of-living adjustment to certain annuitants of the Teacher Retirement System of Texas.”

Proposition 10 ☑️

“The constitutional amendment to authorize the legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation equipment or inventory held by a manufacturer of medical or biomedical products to protect the Texas healthcare network and strengthen our medical supply chain.”

Proposition 11 ☑️

“The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to permit conservation and reclamation districts in El Paso County to issue bonds supported by ad valorem taxes to fund the development and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities.”

Proposition 12 ☑️

“The constitutional amendment providing for the abolition of the office of county treasurer in Galveston County.”

Proposition 13 ❌

“The constitutional amendment to increase the mandatory age of retirement for state justices and judges.”

Proposition 14 ☑️

“The constitutional amendment providing for the creation of the centennial parks conservation fund to be used for the creation and improvement of state parks.”


Uvalde Mayor

  • Cody Smith 1,667 (65.4%) ☑️
  • Kimberly Mata-Rubio 837 (32.8%)
  • Veronica Martinez 46 (1.8%)
The community chose an insider and former mayor to serve the remaining year on the term of Don McLaughlin, who is running for the Texas House of Representatives.

San Antonio River Authority

Director at Large: "Per H.B. No. 1535, 88th Leg., R.S. 2023: The person who receives the highest number of votes shall serve a four-year term ending in 2027. The second-place candidate shall serve a two-year term ending in 2025."

  • Liza González Barratachea 36,830 (26.61%)☑️
  • Patrice Melancon 31,852 (23.01%)☑️
  • Dan Rossiter 29,986 (21.66%)
  • Joel Solis 23,017 (16.63%)
  • Joedy Yglesias 16,747 (12.10%)

For Mayor City of Converse, Texas

  • Al Suarez 1,105 57.73% ☑️
  • Deborah James 809 42.27%

For Council, Place No. 1 City of Converse, Texas

  • Jacqueline Angulo 587 35.13%
  • Stephanie Gonzalez 697 41.71% ☑️
  • Michael B. Meyer 387 23.16%

For Council, Place No. 3 City of Converse, Texas

  • Kassandra Leon 869 53.21% ☑️
  • Nancy M. Droneburg 764 46.79%

For Council, Place No. 5 City of Converse, Texas

  • Stacey L. Adams, Sr. 979 60.36% ☑️
  • Christopher L. Clark 643 39.64%

CITY OF CONVERSE - Proposition A

  • For 755 39.16%
  • Against 1,173 60.84% ☑️

CITY OF CONVERSE - Proposition B

  • For 1,069 58.32% ☑️
  • Against 764 41.68%

CITY OF CONVERSE - Proposition C

  • For 1,452 76.14% ☑️
  • Against 455 23.86%

CITY OF CONVERSE - Proposition D

  • For 1,431 76.36% ☑️
  • Against 443 23.64%

CITY OF CONVERSE - Proposition E

  • For 1,297 69.06% ☑️
  • Against 581 30.94%

CITY OF CONVERSE - Proposition F

  • For 1,422 75.20% ☑️
  • Against 469 24.80%

CITY OF CONVERSE - Proposition G

  • For 1,163 63.55% ☑️
  • Against 667 36.45%

CITY OF CONVERSE - Proposition H

  • For 1,536 82.36% ☑️
  • Against 329 17.64%

CITY OF CONVERSE - Proposition I

  • For 1,025 56.79% ☑️
  • Against 780 43.21%

CITY OF CONVERSE - Proposition J

  • For 798 43.14%
  • Against 1,052 56.86% ☑️

CITY OF CONVERSE - Proposition K

  • For 1,528 81.80% ☑️
  • Against 340 18.20%

CITY OF CONVERSE - Proposition L

  • For 1,595 85.34% ☑️
  • Against 274 14.66%

CITY OF HELOTES - PROPOSITION A

  • For 1,082 80.03% ☑️
  • Against 270 19.97%

CITY OF HILL COUNTRY VILLAGE - PROPOSITION A

  • For 195 89.04% ☑️
  • Against 24 10.96%

CITY OF HILL COUNTRY VILLAGE - PROPOSITION B

  • For 169 77.88% ☑️
  • Against 48 22.12%

CITY OF HILL COUNTRY VILLAGE - PROPOSITION C

  • For 170 79.44% ☑️
  • Against 44 20.56%

FOR COUNCIL MEMBER, PLACE 3 City of Schertz, Texas

  • Paul Macaluso 2,203 65% ☑️
  • Tyrone Taylor 1,175 35%

FOR COUNCIL MEMBER, PLACE 4 City of Schertz, Texas

  • Danielle Craig 592 18%
  • Robert Carl Marks, Jr. 451 14%
  • Michael Armstrong 753 23%
  • Tiffany M. Gibson 1,540 46% ☑️

FOR COUNCIL MEMBER, PLACE 5 City of Schertz, Texas

  • Paul J. Kendzior 1,188 35%
  • Robert M. Westbrook 2,237 65% ☑️

For Council, Place 4 City of Windcrest, Texas

  • Marcus Yax 672 62.28% ☑️
  • Billy Gipson 407 37.72%

For Council, Place 5 City of Windcrest, Texas

  • Belinda Hill-Herbst 515 47.95%
  • Adam Astleford 559 52.05% ☑️

For Mayor City of Windcrest, Texas

  • Dan Reese 877 100.00% ☑️

Board of Directors - At Large Green Valley Special Utility

  • Bob Roberson 1,021 (22%)
  • Nicholas A. (Nick) Sherman 1,203 (26%)
  • Joey Neve 774 (17%)
  • Shari McDaniel 1,478 (33%) ☑️

For Trustee, Place No. 2 Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City Independent School District

  • Alberto Ramirez 2,497 44.76%
  • Margaret A. Carlin 2,900 55.24% ☑️

For Trustee, Place No. 1 Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City Independent School District

  • Jerry Perkins 4,500 100.00% ☑️

For Trustee, Place No. 3 Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City Independent School District

  • Letticia Sever 4,599 100.00% ☑️
TPR was founded by and is supported by our community. If you value our commitment to the highest standards of responsible journalism and are able to do so, please consider making your gift of support today.